1801 R1 XI.S4: Difference between revisions
en>Monica Hurley (Created page with "{{DISPLAYTITLE:XI.S4 (NUREG-1801 R1)}} Return to AMP Table '''XI.S4 [https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part050/part050-appj.html 10 CFR PART 50, APPENDIX J]''' '''Program Description''' As described in [https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part050/part050-appj.html 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J], containment leak rate tests are required "to assure that (a) leakage through the primary reactor containment and...") |
(Revision 0; Reviewed by Garry Young) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
'''XI.S4 [https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part050/part050-appj.html 10 CFR PART 50, APPENDIX J]''' | '''XI.S4 [https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part050/part050-appj.html 10 CFR PART 50, APPENDIX J]''' | ||
'''Program Description''' | '''Program Description''' |
Latest revision as of 19:30, 4 October 2024
XI.S4 10 CFR PART 50, APPENDIX J
Program Description
As described in 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, containment leak rate tests are required "to assure that (a) leakage through the primary reactor containment and systems and components penetrating primary containment shall not exceed allowable leakage rate values as specified in the technical specifications or associated bases and (b) periodic surveillance of reactor containment penetrations and isolation valves is performed so that proper maintenance and repairs are made during the service life of the containment, and systems and components penetrating primary containment."
Appendix J provides two options, A and B, either of which can be chosen to meet the requirements of a containment LRT program. Under Option A, all of the testing must be performed on a periodic interval. Option B is a performance-based approach. Some of the differences between these options are discussed below, and more detailed information for Option B is provided in the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (US NRC) Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.163 and NEI 94-01, Rev. 0.
Evaluation and Technical Basis
- 1. Scope of Program: The scope of the containment LRT program includes all pressure-retaining components. Two types of tests are implemented. Type A tests are performed to measure the overall primary containment integrated leakage rate, which is obtained by summing leakage through all potential leakage paths, including containment welds, valves, fittings, and components that penetrate containment. Type B tests are performed to measure local leakage rates across each pressure-containing or leakage-limiting boundary for containment penetrations. Type A and B tests described in 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, are acceptable methods for performing these LRTs. Leakage testing for containment isolation valves (normally performed under Type C tests), if not included under this program, is included under LRT programs for systems containing the isolation valves.
- 2. Preventive Action: No preventive actions are specified; the containment LRT program is a monitoring program.
- 3. Parameters Monitored or Inspected: The parameters to be monitored are leakage rates through containment shells; containment liners; and associated welds, penetrations, fittings, and other access openings.
- 4. Detection of Aging Effects: A containment LRT program is effective in detecting degradation of containment shells, liners, and components that compromise the containment pressure boundary, including seals and gaskets. While the calculation of leakage rates demonstrates the leak-tightness and structural integrity of the containment, it does not by itself provide information that would indicate that aging degradation has initiated or that the capacity of the containment may have been reduced for other types of loads, such as seismic loading. This would be achieved with the additional implementation of an acceptable containment inservice inspection program as described in XI.S1 and XI.S2.
- 5. Monitoring and Trending: Because the LRT program is repeated throughout the operating license period, the entire pressure boundary is monitored over time. The frequency of these tests depends on which option (A or B) is selected. With Option A, testing is performed on a regular fixed time interval as defined in 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J. In the case of Option B, the interval for testing may be increased on the basis of acceptable performance in meeting leakage limits in prior tests. Additional details for implementing Option B are provided in US NRC Regulatory Guide 1.163 and NEI 94-01, Rev. 0.
- 6. Acceptance Criteria: Acceptance criteria for leakage rates are defined in plant technical specifications. These acceptance criteria meet the requirements in 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, and are part of each plant's current licensing basis. The current licensing basis carries forward to the period of extended operation.
- 7. Corrective Actions: Corrective actions are taken in accordance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, and NEI 94-01. When leakage rates do not meet the acceptance criteria, an evaluation is performed to identify the cause of the unacceptable performance, and appropriate corrective actions must be taken. As discussed in the appendix to this report, the staff finds the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to address the corrective actions.
- 8. Confirmation Process: When corrective actions are implemented to repair a condition that causes excessive leakage, confirmation by additional leak rate testing is performed to confirm that the deficiency has been corrected. As discussed in the appendix to this report, the staff finds the requirements of https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part050/part050-appb.html 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B], acceptable to address the confirmation process.
- 9. Administrative Controls: Results of the LRT program are documented as described in 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, to demonstrate that the acceptance criteria for leakage have been satisfied. The test results that exceed the performance criteria must be assessed under 10 CFR 50.72 and 10 CFR 50.73. As discussed in the appendix to this report, the staff finds the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to address the administrative controls.
- 10. Operating Experience: To date, the 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, LRT program has been effective in preventing unacceptable leakage through the containment pressure boundary. Implementation of Option B for testing frequency must be consistent with plant-specific operating experience.
References
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactors, Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, 2000.
10 CFR 50.72, Immediate Notification Requirements for Operating Nuclear Power Reactors, Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, 1997.
10 CFR 50.73, Licensee Event Report System, Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, 1997.
NEI 94-01, Rev. 0, Industry Guideline for Implementing Performance-Based Option of 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix J, Nuclear Energy Institute, July 26, 1995.
US NRC Regulatory Guide 1.163, Performance-Based Containment Leak-Test Program, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, September 1995.